"Just how you compare a continaul tone medium to a pixal medium is beyond me because once you digitize the film they are both forms of digital images..so lets turn the usall comparason around.. take the same image on 35mm velvia slide film and on a 6mp dslr pump up the saturation and whatever else you want to do to it in PS to make it match the velvia slide then write the digital file to a film reader and output it as a slide, then project both images on a 8x6 screen and you sure as hell will see what a lack of pixal resolution is like..now thats a test instead of the usuall converting the film to digital."
Crafy - is this something that you've actually done/seen or a speculation? (And I ask this as a question, not to be argumentative.)
While I have many (35+ years) experience of shooting slides and a few years of shooting digital I have little experience in direct comparisons.
A few weeks ago I was a guest at a camera club in a nearby town. The presentations were via print, slide (Kodak and Agfa projectors) and a digital projector (a rather basic unit borrowed from the local elementary school). I was very surprised at how much better the digital projections looked in spite of the very low resolution. The slides were from various photographers, were generally good work, and seemed to be about the quality that I was used to. The digital projections (largely from low pixel/consumer cameras) just plain smoked them. The film images looked soft and fuzzy in comparison.
Now I have no doubt that the transparencies held more detail than a ~2 meg digital. And the projection level was probably in the neighborhood of 1 meg. But at normal viewing distance the extra resolution of the film didn't jump out and grab your attention.