bobtrips wrote:Ray -
Would you please list your 'film' works better items?
I'm not trying to be argumentative or start a fight. I had a long list a couple of years back but my list has been shrinking. I'd like to know if I've overlooked something.
Bob, first let me apologize for my post here, I should have included some more text but I think maybe you just like a good argument, if you really want to help people here I think thats great but it would be more helpful to have an open mind and give the pro's and cons of each
I would also like to make my position clear, I am NOT pro film or digital I use the best tool for the job, this is where I think we are different you would seem to be VERY pro digital (just my opinion from reading your posts here in the FILM forum and on Dpreivew)
This thread starts with for $150 they would like to buy a camera to learn photography and that rules out 99.9% (CF cards will eat up half) of all digi's let alone a decent one with a larger sensor, that $150 could get a nice used Rollei TLR medium format camera and a few rolls of film and processing
I have seen these never ending threads film vs. digital and have no desire to get into one with you so all I will say is go out and see for yourself look at large print from a roll of 120 and some smaller 11x14's from a DSLR its will be painfully clear film is still much better at fine detail and dynamic range
Bob I wish I could speak face to face with you, I am 100% sure if I could show you a couple large prints from my Bronica (worth about $500 used) you would see what Im talking about, I would even bring a few digital prints from a D1x and D2h to compare ($2500-3000 used)
I would like nothing more than to only have 1 type of camera but for many things film is still a better choice and on budget film gear is a great choice (I am speaking of QUALITY not QUANTITY of images)
Pointless debate, and everone should go out and compare print quality themselves
regards
Ray