billinchapelhill wrote:This shot is a big favorite of mine right now and I thought it would be quite popular but not so far. Due to the long night time exposure under heavy yeloow street lighting, the original was heavily monochrome and dominated by dull yellows. So I did much more color correction and painting than is my norm. The result is that the PP is much more obvious and I ask you if you feel that it is too much.
Bill, you saw that some feel they preferred the original because it
was rawer (I did too and like it the way it was). But you expressed
that the original wasn't acceptable to you for the reasons given. Then
you asked us if the PP on the first one was too much and how we felt.
I've since visited your galleries to see that the color-corrected version
you made is very popular actually, so I was a little confused until I saw
that half of the positive feedback was after posting this thread. But the
comments before that were rightfully =
very positive because it
SO fits your theme of Twilight Zone in which things should look a bit
out of the ordinary and was very striking with that in mind. No
reality-rawness was needed or wanted there.
Then you wrote:
billinchapelhill wrote:Per the last 2 posts, here it is in mono with minimal pp work. For sure this is a pretty simple way of dealing with the exposure and sodium lighting issues, and presented this way it does not turn off the viewer that has those kind of viewing pre-requisites.
I like it quite well in mono but it brings the image closer to normal and for me sacrifices the uniqueness of the bizarre lighting coloring. If I was more patient and skilled at touch up, I think the colored verzion would grab more of those so disposed.
As a result of what you wrote, I did a social boo-boo. I had participated
in Jim Critchley's thread asking for people to submit their own solutions
if someone was having problems with a picture rather than just do text
responses.
http://forum.pbase.com/viewtopic.php?t=31107
But that was in the Technical thread, not here in Artistic
(I got the topic area wrong), so apologies for deciding to try what Jim
had requested but didn't get much activity on -- people here submitting
alternative post-processing rather than just agreeing something didn't
work.
In my case, it's in a non-public gallery and accessible only through this
forum and thread.
I hope I haven't offended you.