The first one. There plenty going on and the are a number of colours which particulalry compliment each other. The second one is a little busy with the stones to the left, its also of sothing I can recognise so it feels a little odd at that angle. The third one seems a little over exposed in some areas but I think it is that it has less form, the colours are not so rich and the colours compliment each other just a little better.
It is all subjective and I guess someone else may think differently but the first one keeps my attention more.
I like the first one . Very dynamic. But it all depends on what kind of contest, what kind of mood, as I almost prefer the third one, more abstract, calmer and homogeieity of colours....How on earth do you do that?
I also like the first one the best, with the third one second and the second one last. That's clear eh?
The first and third are as if they're taken by a different photographer from the second one. Number one actually kinda reminds me of those old posters showing exotic locations, very Art Deco I think.
According to me second picture is so good than other two picture because
this picture is represented the new technology by which can become so power ful.
This is a perfect example of the subjectiveness of interpretation. I am drawn to the first one because of the incredilble movement you have captured. But I am sure others could be drawn to the other two because they are all fine pictures. I think the most important question is: Which one do you like best?
Brickfielder, the second image looks to me like a railway carriage suspension and track etc it just needs to be rotated to the left by 90 degrees......
I like the firs one except for what appears to be haloing around the subjects, I assume that this is an artifact from HDR proccessing????