Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:16 am
There is one advantage, you didn't really tell us what you saw so that makes it more likely that anything would possibly leap out as either a techical issue, not be seen at all, or not be readily explained, etc. Telling us what to expect biases the examination, although you circled one spot. Having plunked around some "ghost" sites, it's clear that there are a wide variety of levels of technical sophistication when it comes to photography when it comes to examining and analyzing these kinds of things. Unfortunately, that usually means some rather explainable technical things are not recognized for what they are.
FWIW, the Whaley House window appears to be a matter of a variety of reflections and interior objects. Hard to resolve at a later point or without having been able to see what's actually in the room or outside the window. It might simply be an interior decoration with some light from the little lamp with leaf reflections (like in other parts of the window) superimposed.
The Hearthstone Inn blur of light in the left is likely something close to the camera, like a strap, etc. One of the problems with that image is that's the kind of result that does come from procedure problems and why you often see at the ghost photo sites, an emphasis on being careful about camera straps, loose clothing, or other objects which might enter the flash zone. Again, looking at it after the fact, one would need to be able to positively eliminate the potential that there was a physical reflection before you could try to move forward. Again, it's hard to do that now. It doesn't look too different from known natural results.
Orange Face: Can't tell. We don't know what was off over there so we can't really tell what might or might not have given a reflection (assuming you are thinking of the thing in the right side and not orange grass). That's one of the problems with using flash, you'll get reflections from objects you might not have seen, light reflects back onto the objects from the side or bright objects in the field of the flash, etc. If it was a crystal clear night and there was nothing for hundreds of yards, maybe?? interesting. As it is, there isn't the info to rule out natural issues. slow reflection and unknown background.
The deerorb appears to be a fairly typical close reflecting object.
Beforemist? I don't see anything unusual here - which is I think meant as a before and after comparison.
Mist1? Some dust/orb spots. If it's the rectangular light spot in the dormer, I'd be completely inclined to believe it's a flash reflection from one of several rectangular, shiny objects present in the area. Like the pictures on the wall and the other camera, etc. I mean you could play games measuring angles and the like but that square corner would almost have to be man-made.
TV1: nothing leaps out here.
I think flash "caused" most of the seeming phenomenon, the others could probably be (or more acurrately have been) resolved by working to strict protocols and being clear about conditions, etc.