pstewart wrote:/.../I learned something wonderful about my Digital Rebel, which is no doubt the same for all good digital cameras--that you get so much more "picture" than you do with a scanned negative.
Not quite true - well scanned MF and LF negatives still blows digital camera images out of the water if you're talking about consumer-prosumer digital cameras (have you ever looked at a LF slide through a 10x loupe?

).
Enlargements (prints) beyond 20" is also still an area where film still 'dominates'.
Honestly don't really care as cameras are just tools to me. The only reason I don't own one right now is that I can't stand the feel of the plasticky bodies and controls. When I use my Hasselblad or old Olympus metal body cameras I feel that its a tool that fits my hand and the way I think and work.
In 3 years I'm sure the prosumer range cameras will rival and exceed the sheer media->pixel count of MF/LF cameras but at that time I am hoping that digital backs will have dropped in price so that I can go that way and completely skip the 35mm equivalent DSLR's.